Funny Baptist Article On Alcohol And Drinking
Question: Why do you always take two Baptists with you when you go fishing?
Answer: Because if you only bring one, he'll drink all your beer.
Most everybody who grew up in the South has a favorite Baptists-and-alcohol joke, usually deriving its punchline from the hypocrisy of a denomination whose members publicly oppose alcohol consumption but privately indulge.
Those jokes could have come to mind for many observers of the Southern Baptist Convention's recent annual meeting, held June 13-14. Although several controversial business items arose from the convention's floor, the one that stirred the lengthiest debate was a resolution condemning alcohol consumption.
Although it passed by a wide margin, several messengers spoke strongly against it - providing the rare specter of conservative Baptists publicly disagreeing with each other over the propriety of alcohol consumption. One member of the convention's Resolutions Committee, arguing in favor of the measure, declared that Southern Baptists "have always stood for total abstinence" from beverage alcohol.
But Baptist history - including the fact that a well-known Baptist minister was the inventor of bourbon whiskey - casts some doubt on that statement's veracity.
"It's not true," said Baptist historian Bill Leonard. "The temperance movement was late but very thorough among Baptists in the South and other Protestants as well. Early on, many Baptists used spirits; some even brewed beer." Leonard has studied the history of the temperance and Prohibition movements that sought to curb or ban alcohol consumption in 19th- and early 20th-century
Leonard, dean of
Leonard also said many Baptist churches served real wine when observing the Lord's Supper late into the 19th century. "I know for a fact that First Baptist Church (of) Savannah, Ga., in particular, used wine for communion until" the 18th Amendment, which instituted Prohibition nationwide, went into effect in 1920, he said.
Leonard said that Baptists, Methodists and other revivalist Protestant sects were most common on the American frontier - away from the established Episcopal and Congregational churches of the East Coast urban areas. This tendency persisted beyond the Civil War and well into the Victorian era.
"On the American frontier...liquor was a very common social beverage," Leonard said.
The harsh conditions, poor water quality and frequency of disease common to pioneer life led to frequent alcohol use for both recreational and medicinal purposes. In many frontier towns, the first non-governmental public institutions established were frequently churches and taverns.
The very prevalence of liquor on the frontier, though, is part of what gave rise to the temperance movement.
"By the 1830s and beyond, Baptists, Methodists and Presbyterians particularly were very concerned by the social problems caused by alcohol abuse," Leonard said.
Those included family strife, spousal abuse and frontier lawlessness exacerbated by rowdy bar patrons and alcoholics desperate to get enough money for another drink.
As a result, concerned frontier Protestants began joining hands with more theologically progressive urbanites in the mid-19th century to give the temperance movement significant power.
"The temperance movement was particularly interesting because it brings together both theological conservatives and liberals," Leonard said. "Many of the social gospel people were part of the temperance movement because they saw what alcohol abuse did to the poor" in urban areas.
Meanwhile, he continued, "The conservatives began to say: One, it's a social problem; it's causing family abuse; and two, the body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and it needs to be treated accordingly. They skip over Paul's words to Timothy about 'taking a little wine for your stomach's sake.'"
Leonard referred to 1 Timothy 5:23, where the apostle Paul advised his spiritual protege to drink wine medicinally for a chronic stomach ailment and to prevent other illnesses.
Whether there is any biblical warrant for Baptists' persistent teetotaling tendencies took center stage in the Southern Baptists' debate over the resolution. The resolution itself cites scant doctrinal or scriptural justification for total alcohol abstinence.
"Whereas, years of research confirm biblical warnings that alcohol use leads to physical, mental and emotional damage (e.g., Proverbs 23:29-35)," the resolution begins, quoting an Old Testament passage that warns about the dangers of drunkenness. The resolution also says that "some religious leaders...are now advocating the consumption of alcoholic beverages based on a misinterpretation of the doctrine of 'our freedom in Christ.'"
The statement did not refer to some biblical passages where alcoholic beverages were treated positively: Jesus' miracle of turning water into wine at a wedding feast and the wine Jesus and the disciples drank at the Last Supper.
That is the problem with a denomination that claims to believe in the perfect nature of the Bible, according to one of its opponents. Benjamin Cole, pastor of
"What frustrated me is not that the resolution mischaracterized the position of those who acknowledge the whole counsel of God in formulating their position on alcohol," he wrote. "Neither was I upset that the convention messengers, having just elected (new SBC President) Frank Page on a platform of ending the (denomination's) narrowing trends, chose to adopt a very narrow and poorly worded resolution. What angered me was that a reasonable discussion about the nature and extent of Christian liberty in the gospel seems impossible among brethren who affirm the inerrancy of biblical authority."
But one prominent SBC leader said Cole's criticism was off-base.
"As noted in the debate on the resolution, it's clear from Scripture that wine was consumed during biblical times - and that it is even encouraged in moderation in select passages of the Bible," wrote James Smith, editor of the conservative Florida Baptist Witness newspaper, in a June 19 editorial on the convention. "But the idea that adopting a resolution which calls for total abstinence of alcohol is anti-biblical fails to take in account the full biblical witness - as well as the pernicious influence alcohol has had in our society and in the lives of countless individuals."
Smith went on to quote an anti-alcohol tract from the SBC's ethics agency that cites Bible passages encouraging Christians, through the daily examples they set, not to cause others to "stumble" morally.
Most of the resolution, Smith noted, denounces the negative social effects of alcohol abuse, including domestic strife and drunk driving accidents.